Will you ever buy architectural walls? Maybe your business is such that you’re never going to be in a position of need to construct new office space, so the idea of architectural walls doesn’t quite relate?
First, let’s talk about the direction the industry is going. Architectural Walls are capturing a large chunk of the market-share from conventional construction. The amount of projects in the last four years have grown exponentially, cutting into the norm of conventional construction, and challenging the way we view our options and plan our spaces.
This growth of walls has eluded to many statements and idioms floating about architectural walls. I’ve heard cost brought up quite often; or that reconfigurable walls didn’t make sense to most organisations; or how the ability to dampen sound is worse, rather than when conventional construction is used; all of these are concepts of misinformation that I will speak to below.
Truth is, we’re all in business to succeed, so whether we’re number-crunchers or savvy-minded-businesspeople, the bottom line matters. Because of the strength of cost in any acquisition, this has been a tool used by benefitting parties to discredit architectural walls. However, let’s start to examine how this misconception has come to be:
1. Glass – the largest contributing factor has been the argument that drywall (or conventional construction) is cheaper than architectural walls. However, every time this argument is used, it is against a standard drywall application versus either clerestory or monolithic glass options. To put that into perspective, imagine being told to stay away from tablet’s because your smartphone is capable enough – that’s not an apples-to-apples comparison:
a. If glass is being used, it has to be compared to conventional alternatives to glass-walls, either demountable walls or a framed glass application; when you use similar options, the hard-costs – glass – end up being the same or similar, so the price gap has been extremely reduced.
b. When just a bare surface wall is being specified for an application, this changes the most significant factor in the price; glass. Owners, general contractors, architects and designers alike, need to be concise when asking for specifications. If they know that price is an issue, they should compare apples-to-apples, rather than test the waters and ask for a glass-walls quote to versus a typical drywall application. The industry would flood if people understood there was a cost-competitive alternative, and that architectural walls doesn’t always mean glass walls.
2. Soft Costs – they’re called soft costs, but their definitely not soft! The methodology of architectural walls and conventional construction are just different. The walls business is at heart a furniture baby, it wants to go through the standard acquisition process and be handled just once. Conventional construction, on the other hand, ties into a bill of materials, where the hard-costs are calculated through materials, and labour is encapsulated throughout the breadth of the project.
The methodology of conventional construction calls for the studs and the drywall, yes, but also the spackled and sanded surfaces; the hardwiring of electrics; the surface or paint coating; the additional materials and labour force the cost to be what it is, which is higher than just a materials cost-comparison.
Whenever people are asking why to use architectural walls, I start to list reason upon reason. However quite often, an argument that is raised, is why do we need the configurability anyways? I have to take it right back home and ask, why do we need to recycle, anyways? I mean essentially, whether you throw it in the garbage or throw it in the blue bin; you’re doing your responsibility and removing it from your possession, right? That’s the ideology behind the question. Even if you don’t have employee churn or never reconfigure the walls, the sustainability impact is quite the same as comparing it to throwing out a pop-can or recycling it. The excuse is used to help conceal the daunting ‘how much is it going to cost?’ question, which is only daunting if you’re not willing to do the math.
Simple math is, the STC rating of standard drywall is 38-40 (without insulation). The standard STC rating of (I’m going to pick the Teknion Altos system, so I do not generalise walls; there are inferior products out there) is 40 (without insulation). With insulation, drywall typically will jump up to 43-44, and Altos utilises a standard sound-deafening insulation that will jump its rating up to 48.
We’ve been waiting for you to ask! The picture of our cover for this article is ‘The Bow’, which is the home to one of the world’s largest installations of full-height demountable wall products. In fact, if all of the Teknion Altos demountable walls were assembled in a straight line, they would extend about 32 km (20 miles). Altos will be used throughout the 58 floors to define individual offices, collaborative workspaces and meeting areas.
For more information Contact: TOTAL OFFICEPlanning Services – Professional Delivery & Installation 420 Banks Road Kelowna, B.C. V1X 6A3 Tel:250.717.1626 / Cell:250.869.5304 Toll Free:1.800.558.DESK (3375) E: info@TotalOfficeBC.caW: http://www.totalofficebc.ca/